Stone residents raise flooding concerns over plans for up to 870 new homes

Three major planning applications could bring up to 870 additional homes to Stone, with residents raising concerns about flooding, drainage and pressure on local amenities.

THE SIGNAL BRIEF

What’s new: Residents have met to discuss three major planning applications which could bring up to 870 additional homes to Stone.

Why it matters: Concerns raised include flooding, drainage and the impact of further development on existing local amenities.

What’s next: Changes to national planning rules from 31 October will introduce tighter restrictions on which applications can be referred to planning committees.

This article is based on reporting from the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), a BBC funded initiative set up to strengthen reporting on local democratic issues. The Staffordshire Signal has taken part in the scheme since September 2026, which means we're able to draw on a selection of LDRS stories alongside our own.

Residents have met to discuss three major planning applications affecting Stone. The meeting, held at Walton Community Centre last week, was arranged by Councillor Jon Powell and gave residents a chance to discuss the planning applications on Marlborough Road and Eccleshall Road.

If all three applications were approved, they could mean 870 additional homes being built in the area. Residents at the meeting say the developments will add to existing issues such as flooding, drainage and the pressure on existing amenities.

The three applications include Richborough Estates’ proposal for up to 240 homes off Eccleshall Road and Bloor Homes’ application for up to 510 homes, specialist housing for older people and a first school on land north of Eccleshall Road. Taylor Wimpey submitted an outline planning application for up to 120 homes on land off Marlborough Road.

Councillor Powell said that the three applications along with the completed development at Udall Grange would be the equivalent to the number of houses in Barlaston. He also told residents that he would call the applications into the planning committee but highlighted recent changes in national planning rules.

From 31 October, a new national scheme of delegation will come into force. This means that more applications will be decided by planning officers, with tighter restrictions on which cases can be called in to the planning committee.

Applications will fall into two categories: Schedule One and Schedule Two applications. Schedule One applications cover smaller types of development, while Schedule Two deals with larger or more complex applications.

For an application to go to committee, it either needs to raise an economic, social or environmental issue of significance to the local area or a significant planning matter. Additionally, both the chair of the planning committee and the head of planning need to agree.

A number of concerns were raised by residents at the meeting, including flooding from the fields and fears that the field which absorbs water will be replaced with hardstanding that will cause more run-off. Councillor Powell told residents that Severn Trent has said developments should avoid increasing the amount of rain and surface water in sewers, as that would increase the flood risk.

“I know we need more houses, but I think this area has done its fair share. There are already issues and more houses are just going to make the situation worse.”

Speaking after the meeting, resident Joan Goodwin said: “I know we need more houses, but I think this area has done its fair share. There are already issues and more houses are just going to make the situation worse.”

“For me, the biggest strength of any community is the fact that we’re a community and we have unity. When we’re bound together it does create strength. I will be doing everything I can do. I will have my five minutes there and I will be making a very strong argument.”

Councillor Jon Powell added: “For me, the biggest strength of any community is the fact that we’re a community and we have unity. When we’re bound together it does create strength. I will be doing everything I can do. I will have my five minutes there and I will be making a very strong argument.”

Written by Jonathan Sutton, Local Democracy Reporter.

Why the Signal exists

Real news takes time. Thanks for taking yours.

You've just read a story that took time to get right. No clickbait, no racing to be first, no ads chasing you down the page.

I started The Staffordshire Signal because I got fed up of local news that chased clicks instead of stories. We're independent, not-for-profit, IMPRESS-regulated and owned right here, so we answer to nobody but you.

The honest bit: local news only survives if local people choose it. If we don't, it goes.

Jenna GoodwinFounder and Editor, The Staffordshire Signal

Love what we do?

Buy us an oatcake! Cheese and bacon, if you're feeling generous. Every tip goes straight into local reporting.

Buy us an oatcake

Miss a proper paper?

Staffordshire's only regional printed magazine, full of stories worth sitting down with, delivered to your door.

Get it delivered

Follow on WhatsApp

Our stories, dropped straight into your phone. No group chat chaos, we promise.

Join the channel

What's On

Find something good to do this week

Markets, gigs, history talks and family days out across Staffordshire. Running an event? Add it to our guide and let the county know.

See what's on Add your event

For local businesses

Run a Staffordshire business?

Our readers keep the Signal going, and the businesses who advertise with us help keep it free for everyone. Reach people who read to the end, across our magazine, Signal Weekly, Signal TV and website.

Enquire about advertising